Yahoo Site Explorer is less intelligent than old Yahoo search?

Yahoo introduced Yahoo Site Explorer recently, and it allows webmasters to check number of links and number of pages indexed easily.  But ... but ... is it more intelligent that old Yahoo search?  For example, I'm pretty sure that Yahoo search just dropped session id url strings automatically, but it seems that Yahoo Site Explorer doesn't do that ...

Kind of wish that Yahoo waited until developers fixed all problems.  Yahoo search also has at least one problem.  Google also had number of problems early this year, and Google still hasn't fixed all problems; so many cached pages are awfully old, for example.  These companies need to better manage their products and services ...

I think that the simple answer to why Google does that is that Google is dysfunctional in many ways.  It's crazy that Google keeps pages that are 1 year or 2 years old in its database, and it shows those cached pages.  It's also crazy that Google creates its rankings using those pages.  I'm not saying that Google is useless, but when you start examining Google as an application, it has so many bugs and flaws.  It's just that Google is a massive application, so we tend not to see it as a broken application.

The thing is that Google doesn't seem to follow robots.txt meticulously.  That's the problem.
When the company has billions of dollars in bank, it's called "incompetence." 

I do not like the browser personally, it sets a default font for you and I will always stick with the old version or Mozilla.